Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Who is telling lies?




Governments?

The pharmaceutical companies?

Those doctors and medical associations who support them? 

Or those minority of doctors and others who disagree about the safety of vaccinating young children with multiple vaccinations?

Is there no reality check for the media here?

No examination of the issues and concerns raised?

No civic responsibility, no moral twinge 

Apparently not

For the record whatever your view on giving multiple vaccinations to very young children

There are increasing numbers of children with autism today

And because I personally do not like what is happening to our young I am posting the following for you to read and think about

There is no moral excuse for me not voicing my concerns again as we see too many young people whose lives have been ruined by early vaccinations

Can we prove it

No

How do we know?

The stories are so similar

The symptoms so similar

The timing so repetitive

How can we know?

The only variables are often those who had multiple vaccinations when very young and those who did not

No we cannot prove it

Our job in this situation is to promote thinking

To personally help and do the best we can for those who come to us

To suggest publicly that all is not well with our young

To publicise our understanding that we are creating untold problems for tomorrow

So let those who know what is going on and do nothing understand that they take their karma

Make no mistake those who gain financially from the multiple vaccinations given to the very young are also forever attacking those who challenge the dangers of multiple vaccinations

Through governments, lobbies and the media those perpetrating this crime, for that is what it is, continue to promote vaccinations as being safe

Nevertheless around the world various people do take issue with these lies, such as

Dr Viera Scheibner a well trusted doctor, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner,is so sure of her facts she sent a letter to the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper.

This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner , was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.
.
She challenged Simon Chapman who wrote an article challenging the anti- vaccination movement in Australia to ‘take his own medicine’
.
She began by saying
.
On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.
.
My response to his provocative article is as follows:
.
If vaccines are such a blessing I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.
.
The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:
.
* DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months
..
* Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months
.
* OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months
.
* Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.
.
The time of the first dose represents month 0.
.
There isn’t a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.
.
Seems fair enough to me but as expected her letter was never answered.
.
Dr Scheibner has always had very strong views on vaccination and has been quoted making the following statements:-
.
Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects.
.
Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over.
.
The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed.
.
Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination.”–Viera Scheibner
.
I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent.
.
Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases.
.
Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention.
.
It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed.”—Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD
.
She is not the only doctor to hold such strong views.
.
Dr Harold Buttram M.D holds similar views. He has said:-
.
Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks.
.
There are NO (none) long term over months or years safety studies on any vaccination or immunization.
.
For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized as to their true nature.Dr Buttram MD
.
As reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1984, tests of T-lymphocyte subpopulations were done on 11 healthy adults before-and-after routine tetanus booster immunizations.
.
Tests showed a significant though temporary drop in T-helper lymphocytes (a class of white blood cells which helps govern the immune system) in all of the subjects.
.
Special concern rests in the fact that in 4 of the subjects the T-helper cells fell to levels found in active AIDS patients.
.
If this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the consequences of the multiple vaccines (twenty-one at last count) routinely given to infants with their immature systems during the first six months of life.
.
However, we can only speculate as to the consequences, as this test has never been repeated. Dr Buttram MD
.
The list of doctors and professionals stating that vaccines are dangerous is growing.
.
Dr Sherri Tenpenny says in a short article Defending the Right to Poison:-
.
I have a little person in my office who had 10 rounds of antibiotics and 17 vaccines by 20 months of age.
.
Yes, now autistic.
.
That should be assault with deadly weapons and the doctor should be in jail.
.
Instead, the parents were kicked out of their pediatrician’s practice for refusing more vaccines and wanting to get their child well.
.
With these annoying, non-compliant parents out of the way, that doctor can continue to do what vaccinators do:
.
Inject toxic substances into children, ruining their health and the lives of the child’s family members
.
Dr Mayer Eisenstein Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children.
.
The Homefirst Medical Services director has said on many occasions that he is not aware of any cases of autism in unvaccinated children.
.
Dr Eisenstein said that the Homefirst Medical Services has taken care of about 30,000 to 35,000 unvaccinated children over the years and he does not remember a single case of autism in children who never received vaccines
.
And yet recent articles and press reports have maintained that there is no connection between vaccinations and autism
.
Use you own judgement as to what is going on
.
And where you know of young parents who are being coerced into giving their children multiple vaccinations get them to inform themselves
.
Get them to go online, talk to others
.
Encourage them to take their rightful position of deciding for themselves what is best for their children
.
Their choices can literally determine the fate of their children
.
And their own lives
.
This is not a casual or simple subject
.
Nor are the possible outcomes

2 comments:

Bayani Mills said...

That is absurd.

After looking up Viera Scheibner, I find she has PhD is in micropaleontology.

Absolutely nothing to do with vaccines.

And while this doesn't prove her wrong, the hundreds of meta-analysis and studies demonstrate there is no correlation between vaccination and autism.

Not-withstandig the very notion of which was derived out of a manufactured report, for which the author was paid to produce, in addition, the author has a patent for a REPLACEMENT vaccination if he was able to show that the MMR vaccine caused autism!

I expect nothing less from her, and her friends at the AVN who copped this public warning.

http://www.hccc.nsw.gov.au/Publications/Media-Releases/PUBLIC-WARNING-/default.aspx

Antony said...

Thank you for your comment I note that you are not addressing the issue but rather Ms Scheibner and her qualifications, why would this be?

The issue is that autism is developing at an alarming rate and one of the correlations appears to be the increasing use of multiple vaccinations on young undeveloped immuune systems.

Any parent has the right, indeed obligation, to inform themselves of anything that might cause harm to their child

Multiple vaccinations are one such issue.

From what we see multiple vaccinations are often the only variable before children became autistic.

For a parent any suspicion that there might be a correlation is frightening and raises the question, why would any government force these vaccinations onto children and GP's if there is any doubt at all?

To say as you do "the hundreds of meta-analysis and studies demonstrate there is no correlation between vaccination and autism".is your right as it is mine to say while there is any doubt think twice.